Klokreations

You are not connected. Please login or register

Internet Take Over

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Internet Take Over on Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:13 am

Guest


Guest
First of all, here's the issue. http://bgr.com/2014/01/14/net-neutrality-court-ruling/

Now.. WHY is this an issue?
Net neutrality is dead
At least that’s the verdict of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which today struck down a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) order from 2010 that forced Internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast and Time Warner Cable to abide by the principles of network neutrality. These principles broadly stipulate that ISP network management must be transparent, and that ISPs can’t engage in practices that block, stifle or discriminate against (lawful) websites or traffic types on the Internet.
That’s the bare bones story, wrapped in ugly acronyms (FCC, ISP, etc.). But why should you care that network neutrality (“net neutrality”) may be gone for good?
1. No more net neutrality means ISPs can now discriminate against content they dislike.
Everyone gets their Internet from an Internet service provider — an ISP like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast or Time Warner Cable. Under net neutrality rules, these ISPs have to treat all content you access over the Internet “roughly the same way" — they can’t speed up traffic from websites they like or delay competitor’s traffic.
Now, with net neutrality gone, ISPs can discriminate, favoring their business partners while delaying or blocking websites they don’t like. Think your cable CEO hates free online porn? Now you’ll know for sure!
2. No more net neutrality means ISPs can now force websites to PAY for faster content delivery.
You know how some sites you go to just load slower than others? Usually, that’s just because the slower site is image heavy, poorly coded, or dealing with intense server load. But with net neutrality gone, ISPs can now start charging hefty fees to websites that want quick content delivery — shifting the long load times to poorer sites that can’t pay up.
Prefer indie retailers to Amazon.com? You may be in for a frustrating future.
3. Destroying net neutrality is bad for small businesses.
Put together items one and two and it becomes clear — negating net neutrality is bad for small businesses. If ISPs force website owners pay for faster load times, tiny retailers and personal websites will be the ones to suffer from slower content delivery.
Alternately — or additionally — ISPs will have no reason not to favor partner sites: Time Warner Cable, for instance, might favor the website of CNN (owned by the Time Warner Corporation) over the websites of competing cable news networks MSNBC and Fox News. Still, it’s the indies again that will lose out here. While Time Warner Cable might favor CNN and Comcast MSNBC, independent news networks almost certainly won’t get special treatment from any ISPs. Expand this out to music sites, web publishing, etc., and you begin to see the problem.
In extreme cases, ISPs may hinder or block content that isn’t produced by partners —much like AT&T did when it owned the telephone networks back in the day.
4. Without net neutrality, entire types of online traffic (like Netflix) may be in jeopardy.
Netflix watchers and BitTorrent users might want to beware — soon your beloved services may not work like they used to. Now that net neutrality’s down for the count, ISPs can discriminate against entire types of traffic: For instance, an ISP could slow or block all peer-to-peer file sharing, or all online video streaming.
Think it sounds unbelievably stupid for an ISP to stifle a certain traffic types indiscriminately? Comcast has seen reason to stifle both streaming video and peer-to-peer in the past.
From an ISP’s perspective, discriminating against some traffic types makes business sense: Many ISPs are also cable television providers, which means the “cord-cutting" enabled by peer-to-peer and streaming online video isn’t good for their bottom line.
5. Without net neutrality, your ISPs can make even more money without actually improving the Internet.
Right now, America’s broadband is slow. It’s slow because ISPs can already make gobs of money by charging the rich a ton for high-quality Internet while leaving the rest of America with subpar (or no) service.
Now, with net neutrality gone, ISPs will be able to make even more money off their existing customer base. They won’t need to improve service or bring broadband to rural areas because they’ll be able to keep growing (financially, at least) by charging content providers more for faster delivery and charging customers more for faster access. In all likelihood, Tuesday’s ruling means the problems with America’s Internet will be magnified.






Now how can we stop this?
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/restore-net-neutrality-directing-fcc-classify-internet-providers-common-carriers/5CWS1M4P
Register and sign the petition. That's it.
We need over 100 thousand signatures by February 14th.
You don't even need to be a US citizen to sign, so PLEASE spread this around and sign the petition.

2 Re: Internet Take Over on Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:56 am

Magix430

avatar
Well according to what history has given us so far, the FCC is basically doing what it's always been doing: regulating everything and causing competition to rise between everywhere and creating corruption so America can go drown in the 1920s all over again.

Also, you'd gotta put some more /n 's in there, the paragraphs are too squashed

3 Re: Internet Take Over on Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:45 pm

Klokinator

avatar
Admin
Why do you always post this stuff in Announcements >.>

I knew this was a thing though. Thought it wouldn't turn out this retarded but this is what happens when our politicians are 50+ who don't even use the internet.


___________________________________
http://klokreations.forumotion.com

4 Re: Internet Take Over on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:11 pm

Guest


Guest
Cause it'll end up majorly affecting the site. Forumotion isn't a large and powerful company, so they'll end up having to pay a ton just to keep their crap running. If you don't pay now, or if you do, prices will go up, cause they need money. They won't care about little sites, they'll reserve their servers for sites who pay enough.
Asides from that, we all play games and use the internet. We'll have to pay way more money to get even decent internet speeds. The change will allow them to give us shitty usage for the same price, and if your internet gets fucked, "oops, whatever dude. Keep paying us, we'll EVeNTUALLY get it fixed lawl".
Government will end up getting rigged. Alot of sites will get shutdown, companies will go under. Etcetc.

Oh, and any private information you use online, like social security number, credit card, etc. They can legally access that information and sell it. You put it on their business, they could do as they please with it. Government wouldn't say crap because they're owned.

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum